![]() Within the behavioural sciences, research into COVID-19 has been motivated by attempts to “nudge” public behaviours in-line with government recommendations (e.g., social distancing Jordan et al., 2021 Lunn et al., 2020).Īt present, there is only limited research investigating moral decision-making in the time of COVID-19. COVID-19 poses significant global challenges, having drastic health, social, and economic impacts (e.g., Anderson et al., 2020 McKibbin and Fernando, 2020 Sohrabi et al., 2020). ![]() Importantly, our findings show that this moralisation predicts sustained individual compliance with government-recommended behaviours.īy November 2021, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) had infected more than 249 million people worldwide ( WHO, 2021). Whilst we find no evidence that utilitarian endorsements have changed during the pandemic at two separate timepoints, individuals have moralised non-compliant behaviours associated with the pandemic such as failing to physically distance themselves from others. Given that many of these challenges have moral relevance, the present studies investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic is influencing moral decision-making and whether moralisation of behaviours specific to the crisis predict adherence to government-recommended behaviours. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose significant health, economic, and social challenges. 3School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.2Department of Psychology, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom. ![]() 1School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |